There is a revolution in the air that seems to be escaping
our nations leaders and managers in politics and all manner of organisations
alike. The more conservative among them are even more myopic to what is
happening, given their tendency to view change as akin to the black plague. As
David Price in his new book, ‘Open’, points out there has been a radical shift
in the way people obtain information, learn, collaborate and organise
themselves. This has all been brought about by the internet and its progeny
such as social media.
People now can use their inherent capacity to learn (an
ability they had in spades until they went to school) to develop their
knowledge and skills in pretty well any area of endeavour. And they do. They
find out how to manage their disease, how to use a lathe, growing great
orchids, build some shelves in the shed, cook a fabulous vindaloo lamb, the
list is endless. All done without necessarily enrolling in a course, without going
to a guru. Instead they bring the gurus to them. It’s all there with a few strokes
of the keyboard and a search engine. Recently, I learned how to turn a bowl on
a lathe from watching YouTube clips made my experts around the globe.
Groups form at will through media such as Twitter to talk
about issues of interest. My own Twitter ‘tribe’ consists of a coterie of
educational practitioners from all around the world. We share information and
talk about what interests us through our blogs, Slideshare, YouTube, Vimeo and
other amazing communication tools. Louis Suarez (not the footballer) talks
about how to run highly effective and engaged teams through the power of
internal social media. There are now numerous examples of how vast crowds of
volunteers to deal with disaster situations and protesters to effect political
change through community action can be recruited in only a few hours if not
minutes using social media.
What this demonstrates to me is that people are
intrinsically motivated given the right conditions and that they can
self-organise. The internet has managed to create the conditions that enable
people to achieve their best.
We have known this for a long time but it is largely ignored
for a number of reasons that I won’t go into here. People function best at work
or any endeavour for that matter when they have autonomy, clear goals, the
freedom to be creative, the capacity to obtain requisite skills and capability,
information, participation in decision-making and strategy, variety, meaningfulness
or purpose, support and respect, and a desirable future. People can
self-organise in groups and effectively project manage them. All of these factors
contribute to engagement, which is know to increase productivity,
effectiveness, innovation and quality.
Our current management systems in many organisations do not
cater well for the sort of ambiguity that is needed for these factors to be
realised. Rather, they are controlling, rigid, and designed to repress rather
than unleash potential. The research has shown that employees in these sorts of
organisations are disengaged and productivity and effectiveness suffers
dramatically.
It takes leaders/managers with specific abilities to be able
to develop and function with an organisational culture that is ambiguous. They
need to be low on the need for control, high on openness to experience, have a
mature tolerance to mistakes, not be overly perfectionistic, have high
emotional stability, be able to learn, be collaborative and have excellent
interpersonal skills, among other things.
If I were designing a job application for a new manager or
leader (or maybe any employee for that matter) it would have, ‘The capacity to
manage ambiguity’, as the number one required attribute.